A correction of:
- H. Prakken, An abstract framework for argumentation with structured arguments.
Argument and Computation 1 (2010): 93-124.
- Definition 6.8 of a well-formed argumentation theory is incorrect, since it allows for counterexamples to some results. The correct definition is:
The correct definition has meanwhile been published in
- An argumentation theory is well-formed iff: if \phi is a contrary of \psi then \psi is not in Kn and \psi is not the consequent of a strict rule.
- S. Modgil & H. Prakken, Revisiting preferences and argumentation.
Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2011), 1021-1026. Barcelona (Spain), 2011.
- S.J. Modgil & H. Prakken,
A general account of argumentation with preferences. Artificial Intelligence 2013, in press.
[PDF]. (Version at AI Journal homepage).